Antimicrobial Activity of Amritarishta Prepared by Traditional and Modern Methods
Preeti
Tiwari*
Head of
Department of Pharmacognosy, Dr. K. N. Modi Institute
of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Modinagar
(U. P.)
*Corresponding Author E-mail: preetitiwari198311@yahoo.com
ABSTRACT:
In the present investigation, different types of test preparations
of Amritarishta as Amritarishta-T,
Amritarishta-M prepared by traditional and modern
methods respectively and marketed Amritarishta were
evaluated for antimicrobial activity against commom
human pathogens. It was observed that all the test preparations of Amritarishta exhibited significant zone of inhibition
against selected common human pathogens. The results indicate that all the test
preparations of Amritarishta as Amritarishta-T,
Amritarishta-M and marketed Amritarishta
might be used as natural drug for the treatment of several infectious diseases caused
by these organisms.
KEY WORDS:
Amritarishta-T, Amritarishta-M,
Antimicrobial activity..
1. INTRODUCTION:
In India, medicinal plants form the backbone of several indigenous
traditional systems of medicine. Pharmacological studies have acknowledged the
value of medicinal plants as potential source of bioactive compounds1.
Phytochemicals from medicinal plants serve as lead
compounds in drug discovery and design2. Medicinal plants are rich
source of novel drugs that forms the ingredients in traditional system of
medicine, modern medicines, nutraceuticals, food
supplements, folk medicines, pharmaceutical intermediates, bioactive principles
and lead compounds in synthetic drugs3.
WHO, report depicts that more than 80% of world’s population rely
on plant based products to meet health care needs. Nearly, 25 to 45% of modern
prescriptions contain plant derived lead molecules as a basic source in drug
formulations. The value of plant based prescribed drugs in 1990 was estimated
at $ 15.5 billion which has been on the raise since then. Furthermore, about
42% of 25 top selling drugs marketed worldwide are either directly obtained
from natural sources or entities derived from plant products4.
Furthermore the active components of herbal remedies have the
advantages of being combined with many other substances that appear to be
inactive. However, these complementary components give the plant as a whole
safety and efficiency much superior to that of its isolated and pure active
components. Presently, in the developing countries, synthetic drugs are not
only expensive and inadequate for the treatment of diseases but are also often
with adulteration and side effects5. Therefore, there is the need to
search for plants and plant derived formulations of medicinal value.
Amritarishta is a polyherbal hydroalcoholic Ayurvedic
preparation and is used as antioxidant and advised as a choice of remedy in
mostly all types of fevers6. The chief ingredient of Amritarishta is guduchi, dried
stem of Tinospora cordifolia.
The chemical constituents reported from stems of Tinospora cordifolia belong to different classes
such as alkaloids as tinosporin7-8, glycosides as cordifoliosides-A and cordifolioside-B9-10,
steroids as β- sitosterol11, sesquiterpenoid
as tinocordifolin12 and a large amount of phenolic
compounds as gallic aciod, ellagic acid, catechin and epicatechin13. These compounds have
many notable medicinal properties as antidiabetic14, hepatoprotective15,
antioxidant16, antimalarial17, immunomodulatory18
and antineoplastic properties19.
Therefore, we undertook the present investigation to evaluate the antimicrobial
activity of Amritarishta-T, Amritarishta-M
prepared by traditional and modern methods respectively and marketed Amritarishta against common human pathogens.
2. Materials and Methods:
2.1 Preparation of Amritarishta-T:
This was prepared by the method as given in The Ayurvedic Formulary of India, Part-I6. All the
ingredients of Amritarishta were procured from local
market, Jamnagar while jaggery was procured from
local market, Mehsana. Authentication of all the
ingredients of Amritarishta was done by Dr. G. D. Bagchi, Scientist, Department of Taxonomy and
Pharmacognosy, Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Lucknow.
Prepared herbarium has been deposited in the Central Institute of Medicinal and
Aromatic Plants, Lucknow for future reference. Identification of all the
individual plant material was done as per The Ayurvedic
Pharmacopoeia of India. Quantity of ingredients taken for the preparation of
batch size 3.072 l of Amritarishta has been
calculated according to the formula as given in The Ayurvedic
Formulary of India, Part-I, 2000.
According to this method, coarsely powdered stems of guduchi (Tinospora cordifolia) with prescribed ingredients as Aegle marmelos
(stem bark), Oroxylum indicum (roots),
Gmelina arborea (stem
bark), Stereospermum suaveolns
(stem bark), Premna integrifolia
(stem bark), Hedysarum gangeticum (entire
plant), whole plant of Paederia foetida,
entire plant of Solanum indicum,
entire plant of Solanum xanthocarpum
and Tribulus terrestris
were placed in polished vessel of brass along with prescribed quantity of water
(12.288l) and allowed to steep. After 12 h of steeping, this material was
warmed at medium flame until the water for decoction reduced to one fourth of
the prescribed quantity(3.072 l) , then the heating was stopped and it was
filtered in cleaned vessel and after that jaggery was
added and mixed properly. Then, prakshepa dravyas as svet jiraka, raktapuspaka, saptaparni, sunthi, marica, pippali, nagakesara, mustaka, katuka, ativisa and indravaruni in fine powdered form were added and this sweet
filtered material was placed for fermentation in incubator for fifteen days at
33±1°C. After 15 days completion of fermentation was confirmed by standard
tests20. The fermented preparation was filtered with cotton cloth
and kept in clean covered vessel for further next seven days. Then, when the
fine suspended particles settled down, it is strained again and poured in amber
colored glass bottles previously rinsed with ethyl alcohol, packed and properly
labelled.
2.2
Preparation of Amritarishta-M:
Method of preparation of Amritarishta-M
was same as followed with Amritarishta-T only in
addition to jaggery, yeast was also added for inducing fermentation21.
2.3
Antimicrobial Activity Test
Antimicrobial activity of Amritarishta-T, Amritarishta-M
and marketed Amritarishta was tested using a modified
disc diffusion assay (DDA) method originally described by Baurer
(1966)22. Test preparations of Amritarishta
were dissolved in 20% DMSO treated water. The inoculums for each microorganism
were prepared from broth cultures (105 CFU/ml). A loop of culture
from the slant stock was cultured in nutrient agar medium overnight and spread
with a sterile swab into Petri-plates. Sterile disc (6 mm dia,
Hi-media Mumbai, India) impregnated with test preparations (100µl/disc) and Kanamycin (30µg/disc) were placed on the culture plates and
incubated for 24h at 37ºC. The solvent (DMSO) loaded disc without test
preparations served as control in the study. The results were recorded by
measuring the zones of growth inhibition. Clear inhibition zones around discs
indicated the presence of antimicrobial activity. All data of antimicrobial
activity were taken as average of triplicate.
3. RESULTS
All types of Amritarishta
as Amritarishta-T, Amritarishta-M
prepared by traditional and modern methods respectively and marketed Amritarishta showed significant antibacterial activity by
exhibiting significant zone of inhibition against common human pathogens as Staphylococcus aureus,
Bacillus subtilis, Salmonella typhii,
Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa as
shown in Table 1.
Table1.
Diameter of Zone of Inhibition (mm) of Amritarishta-T,
Amritarishta-M and marketed Amritarishta
Sample |
Zone of Inhibition (mm) |
||||
Staphylococcus aureus |
Bacillus subtilis |
Salmonella typhii |
Escherichia coli |
Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
|
Amritarishta-T (100µl/disc) |
19.89±0.47 |
24.62±0.57 |
21.49±1.43 |
22.64±0.45 |
22.92±1.26 |
Amritarishta-M (100µl/disc) |
19.24±0.64 |
23.74±0.42 |
20.95±0.82 |
21.94±0.37 |
22.28±1.19 |
Marketed Amritarishta (100µl/disc) |
18.75±0.72 |
23.12±0.89 |
19.78±0.57 |
21.25±0.49 |
21.64±0.97 |
Kanamycin
(30µg/disc) |
28±1.24 |
34±0.98 |
33.14±0.87 |
34.91±1.42 |
32.64±0.59 |
Negative Control (DMSO) |
-ve |
-ve |
-ve |
-ve |
-ve |
All values are shown as mean± SD of three
replicates
4. DISCUSSION:
Plants are known to have beneficial
therapeutic effects documented in Traditional Indian System of Medicine. Though
bioactive products of Giloe and its preparations as Amritarishta have been used in treatment of various
ailments since time immemorial, role of phytochemicals
in inhibition of growth of microorganisms has gained less prominence23.
In the present study, preparations of Amritarishta as
Amritarishta-T, Amritarishta-M
and marketed Amritarishta exhibited significant
antibacterial activity against common human pathogens. Further investigations
may lead to the development of naturally derived new antibiotics of high
potency.
5. REFERENCES:
1.
Prusti A, Mishra SR, sahoo S and Mishra SK. Antibacterial activity of Some Indian Medicinal
Plants. Ethnobotanical Leaflets 2008; 12:227-230.
2.
Ebi GC and Ofoefule
SI (2000) Antimicrobial Activity of Pterocarpus osun stems. Fitoterapia
71:433-435.
3.
Ncube NS, Afolayan AJ, Okoh A. Assessment
Techniques of antimicrobial properties of natural compounds of plant origin:current methods and future
trends. Africal Journal of Biotechnology 2008;
7(12):1797-1806.
4.
Ramya S, Govindaraji V, Kannan NK and Jayakumararaj R. In
vitro evaluation of antibacterial activity using crude extracts of Catharanthus roseus L. Ethnobatanical
Leaflets 2008; 12:1013-1018.
5.
Shariff Z U. Modern
Herbal Therapy for Common Ailments. Nature Pharmacy Series, Spectrum Books
Limited. Ibadan, Nigeria in Association with Safari Books (Export) Limited,
United Kingdom, 2001; vol. 1, 94.
6.
The Ayurvedic Formulary of India,
Part-I. 2000, 1st edition, The Controller of Publications, Delhi, 6.
7.
Kumar S, Verma NS, Pande D and Srivastava PS. In vitro regeneration and screening of berberinein
Tinospora cordifolia.
Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Science 2000;22:61.
8.
Biset NG and Nwaiwu J.Quaternary alkaloids of Tinospora species. Planta
Medica 1983;48:275-9.
9.
Maurya R, Wazir V, Tyagi A and Kapil RS. Cordifoliosides A and
B, two new phenylpropene disaccharides from Tinospora cordifolia
possessing immunostimulant activity. Natural Product
Letter 1996;8:7-10.
10. Gangan VD, Pradhan P, Sipahimalani AT and Banerji A. Cordifoliosides A, B,C:Norditerpene furan glycosides from Tinospora cordifolia. Phytochemistry 1994;37:781-6.
11. Dixit SN and Khosa RL. Chemical investigation of Tinospora cordifolia. Indian Journal of Applied
Chemistry 1971;34:46-7.
12. Maurya R and Handa SS. Tinocordifolin, a sesquiterpene from Tinospora cirdifolia. Phytochemistry 1998;49:1343-6.
13. Kidwai AR, Salooja KC, Sharma VN, Siddiqui
S. Chemical examination of Tinospora cordifolia. Journal of Science and Indian Research
1949; 8:115-8.
14. Stanely M, Prince P and Menon VP. Antioxidant action of Tinospora cordifolia root extract in alloxan diabetic rats.Phytotherapy
Research 2001;15:213-8.
15. Mehrotra R, Katiyar CK and Gupta AP. Hepatoprotective
compositions and composition for treatment of conditions related to hepatitis-B
and E infection. US Patent 749296. 2000.
16. Prince PS and Menon VP. Antioxidant activity of Tinospora cordifolia roots in experimental
diabetes. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 1999;65:277-81.
17. Ikram M, Khattak SG and Gilani SN.
Antipyretic studieson some indigenous Pakistani
medicinal plants. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 1987;19:185-92.
18. Manjrekar PN, Jolly CI and
Narayanan S. Comparative studies of immunomodulatory
activity of Tinospora cordifolia
and Tinospora sinensis. Fitoterapia 2000;71:254-7.
19. Jagetia GC, Nayak V and Vidyasagar MS.
Evaluation of the antineoplastic activity of guduchi (Tinospora cordifolia) in cultured HeLa
cells. Cancer Letter 1998;127:71-82.
20. Mishra S. Bhaisazya Kalpana Vigyan. Varanasi, India: Chaukambha
Surbharati Prakashan;
2005.p. 253-254.
21. Alam M, Radhamani S, Ali U and Purushottam
KK. Microbiological Screening of Dhataki flowers.
Journal of Research in Ayurveda and Siddha 1984; 2(4):371-375.
22.
Bauer RW, Kirby MDK, Sherris JC and Turck M . Antibiotic susceptibility Testingby
standard single disc diffusion method. American Journal of Clinical
Pathology1966; 45:493-96.
23. Sasidharan VK, Krishnakumar T and Manjula CB.
Antimicrobial activity of Nine Common plants in Kerala, India. PJS 1998, 127
(1):59-67.
Received on 22.06.2014 Accepted on 29.06.2014
© Asian Pharma
Press All Right Reserved
Asian J. Pharm.
Res. 4(2): April-June 2014;
Page 114-116